091029_bty_bur_malaysia.swf
HEADLINES
*************************************************************
NEWS ON MIGRANTS
Passport Unpopular with Burmese Migrants
Nationality Verification of Burmese Migrants: A Meaningful Debate
NEWS ON REFUGEES
Eastern Burma ‘Comparable’ to Darfur: TBBC
Security threats in eastern Burma ‘increasing’
Media release: Rising Instability in Eastern Burma.
High-level delegation visits Burmese refugee camps
Living conditions for displaced villagers and ongoing abuses in Tenasserim Division
*************************************************************
??? ??????????????????????????
?????????????????? ??????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????
??????????? ???????? ?
????????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????????
????????? ???????? ????????????? ???????…(???????????????)
????????????????
‘???????? ?????????‘ ?????? ?????????? ???
??????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????????????
************************************************************
NEWS ON MIGRANTS
*************************************************************
Passport Unpopular with Burmese Migrants
By ALEX ELLGEE Thursday, October 29, 2009
MAE SOT—“I’m so happy that my days of worrying about the police are over. I can now travel freely around Thailand without worrying about being extorted or arrested,” said Ko Thaw Dar, a Burmese migrant worker in Bangkok.
When he was 10 years old, Ko Thaw Dar and his family fled from the hardships of Burma to try to make a living in Thailand. For years, he lived in fear of the Thai police, often having to pay bribes or risk being thrown in a detention centre or worse, forcibly repatriated to Burma.
Seventeen years later, Ko Thaw Dar is a chef at a restaurant in Bangkok and is the proud owner of a short-term Burmese passport.
Eager to escape the uncertainty of illegal migrant life, Ko Thaw Dar jumped at the opportunity when his employer offered to help him by taking him to the Thai-Burmese border to apply for nationality verification papers.
For some, Ko Thaw Dar’s case could be seen to be a success story. He didn’t pay one baht more than he should have and was safely escorted to and from the border by his employer. However, activists argue that the scheme that offers migrant workers the chance to work legally and travel in Thailand is far from perfect.
Ko Thaw Dar is in the minority, one of just 2,000 out of an estimated 2 million Burmese migrants in Thailand, who, according to Thai Labor Minister Phitoon Kaewthong, have registered at a Nationality Verification Centre and obtained short-term (usually one year) passports.
Labor activists blame the low turnout on a lack of public relations and information available to migrants. They say the workers don’t know about the scheme and, for those who have heard of it, the process is shrouded in rumors.
This is certainly true in Mae Sot where most factory owners haven’t uttered a word about the verification process to their Burmese employees.
“The salaries are so low in Mae Sot and the conditions so bad that employers fear the liberty the workers will have if they obtain travel passports,” explained Ko Moe Swe, a representative of the Yaung Chi Oo Workers Association.
“If the workers verify their nationality then they can travel freely in Thailand. The factory owners know they would leave their 50 baht (US $1.50) per day jobs in Mae Sot to go to other areas like Bangkok where they can make 300 baht ($9) per day,” he said.
For most migrant workers working in the Mae Sot area, their salaries are already so low they can’t afford to apply for verification. And the motivation to apply is dampened by stories of corrupt brokers and officials.
One Burmese factory worker in Mae Sot who spoke to The Irrawaddy on condition of anonymity expressed her frustration.
She said that she and her fellow workers were originally hopeful when they heard that four Burmese officials and two Thai immigration officers had joined forces and visited the knitting factory where she worked to pressure the owner to tell the workers to apply.
The employer announced to the Burmese workers in the factory that they had each been offered a cheap price of 5,000 baht ($150) and that if they wanted to apply for short-term passports, now was a good time.
Most of the workers started the verification process, but 10 days later the employer announced that the fee had risen to 7,500 baht ($225).
“How can they not know what the price is?” the Burmese employee said with a sigh. “I really don’t understand how the price can increase like that and what they will do with the extra money. I don’t know how suspicious this behavior really is, but they must make the price official and transparent.”
Three broker companies are registered in Thailand to “help” migrant workers complete their forms and transport the workers to the verification centers, which are dotted along the border with Burma.
Labor rights organizations argue that the prices they charge are too high for low-paid migrant workers and are deterring people from applying.
Illegal brokers are also active; reports have surfaced of applicants paying bogus brokers more than 10,000 baht ($300) for a “speedy” process, never to see the broker again.
Sawit Keawan, the general secretary of Thailand’s State Enterprise Workers Relations Confederation, believes the scheme was built with good intentions, but that all parties involved need to accept their faults before it can be a success.
“In order for the scheme to work, the Thai government needs to accept that there is corruption on its side which is making the scheme costly and inefficient,” he said.
“And for the Burmese government, they need to accept that certain ethnicities are still Burmese and have the right to verify their nationality like any other Burmese national.”
Applicants, who are from ethnic groups aside from Burmans, are reported to have had many difficulties applying for short-term passports.
Most notably, according to an official from the Tak- Mae Sot Nationality Verification Centre, every Burmese Muslim who had applied for verification had been rejected.
“We have processed more than 1,000 applicants,” he told The Irrawaddy. “There have been no problems so far apart from for Muslim people, who have all had their applications rejected by the Burmese government.”
For the Rohingya, a group disowned by the Burmese military government and driven into exile, mostly to Thailand and Malaysia or to makeshift camps in Bangladesh, the certainty of rejection makes them even more vulnerable to abuse.
“The Burmese government doesn’t even accept that Rohingya people are Burmese, so there is no hope that they can verify their nationality,” explained Enayet Ullah, a member of the Burmese Rohingya Association in Thailand.
“It’s more likely that a Rohingya applicant will be arrested than receive a passport,” he added.
With the February 2010 deadline fast approaching for applications, David Feingold, a UNESCO director, told The Irrawaddy he believes that many could miss out on the opportunity to obtain the short-term passport, thus increasing their susceptibility to human trafficking.
“It seems on the surface that its very unlikely many people will register before 2010, even if everything goes smoothly and there is no corruption,” he said. “If the deadline is not extended then a large number of people will be left in a vulnerable situation because they will not have passports. Anything that increases someone’s vulnerability will increase their vulnerability to trafficking.”
Like the Rohingya, the Shan communities working around Chiang Mai also fear they will be persecuted for their ethnicity. A representative of the MAP foundation, a Thailand-based migrants rights’ group, told The Irrawaddy it had come to their attention that in one group of seven Shan workers, three of them had their applications rejected and papers taken without explanation by the Burmese government when they applied for nationality verification.
The Shan community’s sentiments were echoed at a meeting on Sunday in Chiang Mai, organized by the Workers Solidarity Organization, when it was announced that over 2,000 migrant workers working in the Chiang Mai area rejected the scheme and requested the Thai government to revert back to the previous registration process.
Many are worried about reprisals against their families by the Burmese authorities. Rumors have circulated among migrant communities of mass arrests at the border and soldiers looting money from applicants’ families as penalties for their relatives’ illegal entry into Thailand.
Ko Moe Swe told The Irrawaddy how he had spoken to a Burmese woman who worked in a fisheries factory in the Mahachai area near Bangkok.
She said she received a telephone call from her mother some two months after she had applied for nationality verification. She said that soldiers went to her mother’s home and demanded that she pay $30 per month tax because her daughter had gone to work in Thailand illegally.
The biggest worry for most migrant workers about the scheme is losing money. The possibility that the Burmese government may extort tax from them in the future has deterred many from applying.
Ko Thaw Thar’s happiness was broken by the realization that he could be taxed in the future.
“One thing I’m very worried about is that the Burmese government will tax me in the future,” he said. “Even though we are so poor and making such little money, I am sure they would try to find a way to take our money while we are abroad.”
All the agencies involved appear to agree that there are too many concerns for the migrant workers to make the nationality verification scheme a success.
The process has to be changed, and it is widely accepted that this will require increased cooperation between the Burmese and Thai governments, which must ensure a transparent system exists and that migrant workers feel safe and can afford to apply for short-term passports.
http://irrawaddy.org/highlight.php?art_id=17092&page=2
*************************************************************
Nationality Verification of Burmese Migrants: A Meaningful Debate
By Andy Hall, October 30, 2009
The Thai Government recently reiterated its policy to formalise the status of around 2 million migrants from Burma working here. Nationality verification (NV) is apparently required because these migrants left Burma without permission and entered Thailand “illegally”.
What with an abundance of brokers assisting them, and the fact that wide swathes of the Thai economy remain reliant on them, it’s easy to get in at a cost. Once registered to work “legally” in the most dangerous jobs Thailand has to offer, migrants’ status remains “illegal, pending deportation”. Refused work accident compensation, the right to ride motorbikes and travel outside a province of registration, migrants live in a grey hole where insecurity and exploitation thrives.
So something apparently needed to be done to solve this unjust situation. NV means that migrants become both “Burmese” and “legal” at the same time. They also receive a “temporary” passport, which entitles them to benefits in Thailand they were previously denied.
Since NV involves working with the junta, difficulties were always going to arise. While Cambodia and Laos sent diplomats to complete NV for their workers in Thailand, Burma insisted its workers return home to complete the process. NV for Burmese workers ground to a halt – only to reawaken last year when Thailand allowed the process to be completed on Burmese soil.
Many observers, including political groups engaged in a sixty-year political struggle against the junta, sensed NV was not a magic solution to Thailand’s irregular migration challenges. Instead, it seemed a tad fishy. So is NV a win-win process? If not, the lives of millions of migrants are potentially at stake.
Migrants currently send their biographical information to the Burmese authorities and then travel to Burma to complete NV. Since August, six NV centres have become operational on both sides of three main Burma-Thailand border crossings. Two more centres are planned. Once the process is complete, migrants return with “temporary” passports and two-year visas.
However, for many, NV remains a migrant’s worst nightmare and should not be attempted.
Firstly, NV is potentially dangerous, especially for migrants from the plethora of ethnic groups in Burma who are still at war with the Burmese. They are being asked to deal directly with the junta, which for many is a scary prospect that brings fear of persecution and imprisonment for themselves and their families.
Secondly, NV is complex and non-transparent. Thailand has mounted no public awareness campaign. Officials simply tell migrants to complete NV before February 28, 2010 or be deported. A Burmese government leaflet is the only official information released – claiming the process is “risk free, cheap and friendly”. The reality is that few migrants believe the junta.
Thirdly, NV is costly. The current price is Bt3,000 to 10,000. Brokers remain unregulated and are fleecing migrants, given that someone needs to guide them through the 13-step process. The costs are inappropriate, given that a previous migrant registration process just ended, and migrant incomes are so low.
With such a secretive process, there has been much talk: Land confiscation for families of migrants attempting NV; migrants from Bangkok arrested on arrival in Myawaddy and sent to Insein Prison; widespread extortion by junta officials; migrants committing suicide to avoid the process. Few can ascertain whether these rumours are true, but Thai and Burmese officials denied them outright when they met the media in Bangkok recently.
Migrants have many serious questions about NV, but receive few answers. How is nationality verified? How long does it take? Why are Muslims excluded? What are the actual benefits? Why does Burma refuse to allow NV to take place in Thailand? Is NV related to the 2010 Burmese election? No official answers. So migrants simply dismiss statements that deny the risks.
The number of migrants completing NV is still low – only around 2,000 of an eligible 1 million have been issued temporary passports. But for advocates of migrant rights, should we accept NV as a beneficial reality and move to discuss how it can be undertaken most effectively and safely? What are the alternatives?
Since the early 1990s, Thailand has implemented a piecemeal migrant registration policy that has neither protected rights nor effectively managed flows. The standard procedure has been yearly Cabinet resolutions to allow registration of migrants for 30 days, or occasionally granting an amnesty to all aliens in the country. Costs are Bt3,800 for a work permit and health insurance. Often no change of employer is allowed. Due to lack of awareness, it’s not rare for officials to learn about registration policies after they have been implemented, while employers seem to miss the processes altogether before they end for another year.
So on balance, NV appears a more viable system for managing irregular migration in Thailand than anything. It can at least potentially formalise entry and exit from the country in a way that could reduce exploitation, smuggling and even perhaps trafficking. But if a migrant’s home country is Burma, does something change?
Of course, the root cause of Burmese migrants’ problems is Burma itself. But until that problem can be solved, Thailand cannot deny its responsibility to regulate Burmese migrants and support their access to rights and welfare in the most effective way it can. Activists too should share this heavy burden.
The Thai government’s new NV policy, whatever its ulterior motive may be, should be welcomed. For it has started a meaningful debate. When one of the most vulnerable workforces in the world is faced with systematic exploitation – characterised by one country that refuses to acknowledge its benefits and another that refuses to respond to it – the debate will eventually expose the serious predicament faced by Burmese migrants currently toiling in Thailand.
These migrants are usually passive victims of a situation they were not involved in creating. To be the subjects of intense discussion – which may eventually find a lasting solution to their sad predicament – is surely the least they deserve.
Andy Hall is director of the Human Rights and Development Foundation’s Migrant Justice Programme.
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2009/10/30/opinion/opinion_30115498.php
*************************************************************
NEWS ON REFUGEES
*************************************************************
Eastern Burma ‘Comparable’ to Darfur: TBBC
By LAWI WENG Thursday, October 29, 2009
The growing instability in eastern Burma from ongoing military conflict is forcing thousands of ethnic people to become internally displaced persons (IDPs), according to a press release from the Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBBC) on Thursday.
The statement said at least 75,000 people in eastern Burma were forced to leave their homes during the past year, meaning the number of IDPs in the area now exceeds half a million. TBBC compared the scale of displacement to that of Darfur in eastern Sudan.
“After 25 years of responding to the consequences of conflict in eastern Burma, it is tragic to see the causes remain unaddressed and the situation is likely to further deteriorate during the next 12 months.” Jack Dunford, the executive director of TBBC said in the statement.
Bangkok-based TBBC, an umbrella group of aid agencies that supplies a high percentage of humanitarian aid to IDPs and refugees at the Thai-Burmese border, said that between August 2008 and July 2009, some 120 communities were destroyed, making a total of more than 3,500 villages and “hiding sites” in eastern Burma that have been destroyed or forcibly relocated since 1996.
The main threats to human security in eastern Burma are related to militarization, TBBC said. While military patrols and landmines are the most significant and fastest growing threats to civilian safety and security, forced labor and restrictions on movement are the most pervasive threats to livelihoods.
Duncan McArthur, a coordinator of emergency relief for the TBBC, told The Irrawaddy on Thursday: “The people don’t have any security and our survey indicates the situation is getting worse.
“We have documented the situation to highlight the ongoing problems for ethnic people in eastern Burma,” he said.
The northern Karen area and southern Shan State have the highest rates of recent displacement, according to the report. Almost 60,000 Karen villagers are in hiding in the mountains of Kyaukgyi, Thandaung and Papun townships, a third of who fled from artillery attacks or the threat of Burmese government troop patrols during the past year.
In Shan State, nearly 20,000 civilians from 30 villages were forcibly relocated by the Burmese government forces in retaliation for Shan State Army-South operations in Laikha, Mong Kung and Keh Si townships, said TBBC.
The statement said that the scale of displaced villages has been recognized as the strongest single indicator of crimes against humanity in eastern Burma.
http://irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=17093
*************************************************************
Security threats in eastern Burma ‘increasing’
Oct 30, 2009 (DVB)
The fallout from conflict in eastern Burma is likely to deteriorate in the coming year as greater militarization causes further unrest in the region, an aid agency said.
The Thai government has expressed concern about an exodus of Burmese across the border in the run-up to elections next year, while a humanitarian organization warned last month that Thailand faces a “wave of refugees”.
The prediction was reinforced yesterday with the release of a statement by the Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBBC) that said that conflict in eastern Burma was not being given due attention.
“After 25 years of responding to the consequences of conflict in eastern Burma, it is tragic to see the causes remain unaddressed and the situation is likely to further deteriorate during the next twelve months,” said TBBC executive director, Jack Dunford.
“A recent influx of refugees into Thailand and monitoring reports from internally displaced communities indicate that violence and abuse in eastern Burma are increasing.”
Government pressure on ceasefire groups to transform into border guards prior to the elections is a key reason for the unrest and further uprooting of internally displaced persons (IDPs), said Duncan McArthur, emergency relief coordinator at TBBC.
“Of the numbers of IDPs in eastern Burma, around half of them are in ceasefire areas,” he said. “If the tension with the ceasefire groups escalates…it’s going to make those IDPs in ceasefire areas a lot more vulnerable than they have been previously.”
More than 3,500 villages and “hiding sites” have been forcibly relocated or destroyed since 1996, according to TBBC. Around 120 communities were affected between August 2008 and July 2009 alone.
It warns that the situation regarding village relocation is “comparable to the situation in Darfur and has been recognised as the strongest single indicator of crimes against humanity in eastern Burma”.
A report released in July by a panel of leading international jurists also alleged that human rights atrocities in Burma that are comparable to both Darfur and the former Yugoslavia were being underreported.
“[The situation] hasn’t had the same political support from the UN security council in regards to Burma, and eastern Burma in particular,” said McArthur.
In June around 5000 Karen civilians fled into Thialand to escape fighting between the government and opposition Karen National Union (KNU), while an offensive against an ethnic Kokang army in northeastern Shan state forced some 37,000 into China.
“The breakdown of 20 year old ceasefire agreements reflects how the Burmese junta’s ‘road map to democracy’ offers no political settlement for the ethnic minority groups,” said the statement, adding that there is an “urgent need to address ethnic grievances”.
Reporting by Francis Wade
http://english.dvb.no/news.php?id=3004
*************************************************************
Media release: Rising Instability in Eastern Burma.
http://tbbc.org/announcements/2009-10-29-media-release.pdf
*************************************************************High-level delegation visits Burmese refugee camps
Thursday, 29 October 2009 17:58
Cox’s Bazaar, Bangladesh: A four-member high level delegation of ambassadors of America and Norway in Bangladesh visited Burmese refugee camps yesterday at about 10 am to review the situation of refugees in the camps, said a refugee schoolteacher from Naryapara camp.
The delegation comprised two Americans and two Norwegians. They were accompanied by three other Bangladeshi officers.
They visited the women tailoring center, profiling center, vocational training center, and refugee schools of Nayapara refugee camp.
They entered one Abdul Malek’s shed in the camp and asked his name, when and why he left Burma, and how many children he has.
After visiting the Nayapara camp, at around noon, they left for the Kutupalong refugee camp. There, they also visited schools, other projects and observed the situation in the camp.
The aim of the visit was to oversee the refugee situation in the camps and to settle some of the refugees in a third country. They want to have some development programmes in the camp, said a refugee committee member from Nayapara camp.
Before the arrival of the delegation, the Camp-in-Charge of Nayapara camp called some of the refugee leaders for a meeting, but it was canceled by Wahid, the UNHCR officer saying that it will be held the next time, said another refugee of the camp.
However, refugees wanted to say something to the delegation about the situation of the camp, but they did not get the opportunity, said a refugee leader of the camp.
*************************************************************
Living conditions for displaced villagers and ongoing abuses in Tenasserim Division
http://khrg.org/khrg2009/khrg09f19.html
*************************************************************
??? ??????????????????????????
*************************************************************
?????????????????? ??????????????????????? ????????????????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????
??? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ??????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????? ???????????????????? ????????? ?????????????????
??? ????????? (????)?????? ???????????????????? ??????????????????????????? (?)????? ??????? ??????????????????? ?????????? ?????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????????????????? ?????????? ????????????????????? ??(????)????? ????????????????????????? ??????? ?????????? (????)???????? ??????????(???)????? ?????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????????????? ????????? ????????????????????? ??????? ????????????????? ????????????????? ??????? (?)???????? ?????????????????? ????????????????? ????????????? ????????????
??? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????? ????????????????? “ ???????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ????? ??????????????????? ? ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????? ??????? ?????? ” ??????????? ?????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ????????? ????????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ???????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????????????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????
??? ???????? ??????????????????????????? ????????? ???????????????? ??????????????? ??????????? ???????? ??????????????? ??????????? ??????? ??????????????? ????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???? ????????????????????? ??????????????????
??? ??????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????? ????????? ??????????? ????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ??? ?????????????????????? ??????????? ????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????????????????? ????????? ?????? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????? ?????????????????????????
??? ????????? ????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????? ??????????????????????????? ????????? ????????????? ????????????????? ????? ?????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????? ??????? ????????????????????????????
http://www.kaowao.org/b/art09-oct29.php
*************************************************************
??????????? ???????? ?
???????????????/ ?????????? ??? ????
??????-????????????? ???????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????? ??????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????
?????????????? ??????????????? ??????-???????????????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ???? ??????????????????????????? ??????????????? ????????????????
??????????????? ??????????????? ?????????????????????? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ??????????? ??????????? ???????? ????????????????? ??????????????????? ????????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????????
?????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????? ??????? ?????? ???????????????????????? ????????????? ????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????? ?????? ??????????? ????????????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ???????????
“???????? ????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ???????? ?????????????? ??????? ?????? ???? ????????????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ??????? ???????????????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ???????? ???????”
???? ?????????????????? ??????????
????????? ????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????
“????????????????????????? ??????? ???????????????? ??????????????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ?????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????”
???? ??????? ??????????????? ??????????
??????????????????????? ???????????????????? ????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????????????????????? ??????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????? ?????????? ???? ?????? ?????????????
“???????????????????? ????????????????? ????????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ????? ?????? ???? ????????????????? ?????????? ????????????????? ???????????? ????????????? ?????????? ???????????????? ?????????????”
???? ?????????? ??????????
????? ??????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????????????????
?????? ???????????? ????????????? ????????? ???? ???? ??????????????? ???????????????????????????????
??????????????? ??????? ???? ??? ????
??????????????????????????? ???????????? ??????????????
?????????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????????????????
?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????? ????????????????????????? ????????
?????????????? ???????????? ????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????????????
“???????????????????? ??????????????????? ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??????????? ????????? ????????????? ??????????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????????? ????????????? ???????????? ?????????”
???? ??????? ?????????????? ??????????
??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????????? ???????? ????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ??????????? ????????
“?????????????? ?????????????????? ????????????? ???????????? ??????????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????? ????????????????????”
???? ???? ???????? ??????????
???????? ????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????????????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????????????? ?????????????????
??????????? ??????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ??????????????? ?????????? ???????????????
( ??????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ????????????? ?????????? ???????????????????? ??????? ???????????????????????? ????????????????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????? ?????????? ????????? ?????????????? ??????????????? ????????????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????????????? ??????????????? ???????????????????? ??????? ???????????? ???????????? )
http://moemaka.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4996&Itemid=1
*************************************************************
????????????? ?????????? ??????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????????
Thursday, 29 October 2009 20:00
????????? ????????????????? ??????????????? ????????????? ??????? ??????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????? ??????? ???????????????????? ???????
??????? ??????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????????????? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ????????? ????????????????? ????????? ??????????
????????“??????? ????????????????? ??????????? ????????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ??????? ????????????????????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ??????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ???????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ????????????????? ????????? ????????????? ????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????? ??????????????” ?? ??????????
?????????? ?????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????????? ???????? ????????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????????? ????????????? ????????????????? ???????????????????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ?????????????????? ????????
?????????????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ??????????????????? ????????????? ????????????????? ?????????? ????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ????????????????? ?????????? ?????????
*************************************************************
????????? ???????? ????????????? ???????…(???????????????)
??????-???????????? ???????????????? ??? ?????????????????????????? ???(???)??????? ????????????????? ????? ?????? ?????????????????? ??????????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????? ??- ????? ????????????? ?????????????? ?? ??? ???????????????? ????????????????? ??? ?????? ????????? ????? ????????????????????????????? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??????? ????????????????? ??????? ?- ?????????????? ??? ???- ??????????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ???? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ???????????????? ( ?) ????????????????? ?????? (???) ????????? ?????????????????????
??????????????????????????? (?????) ??????? ???????????? .. ??????????????????????????(?) ??????????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? (?) ???????? ????? ????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????????? ??????????????????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????? ??????????? ???????????????????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????????? ??????????????????? ????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????????? ????????????????? ???????????????????????? ??????????????????? ?????????? ??????????????? ???????? ???? ??????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ????? ???????? ? ????????????????????? ? ?????? ? ? ????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ??????????????????? ????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????? ????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ????????????? ???????? ?????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? ? ?????????????? ????????????? ???????????? ???. ????? ???????????????????
http://jacbaburma.blogspot.com/
*************************************************************
????????????????
*************************************************************
‘???????? ?????????‘ ?????? ?????????? ???
????????????? ???????????? ??????????? 29 ??? 2009 ?????? 22 ???? 46 ?????
????????? ? ??????????????????? ??????????? ??????????????? ????????????? ?????? ??????????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ‘???????? ?????????’ ????? ????????? ????????? ???????? ????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????
Burmese Theatre Workshop ??????? ????????? ??????????? Free Word Centre ???? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ? ??????? ???????????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?? ????? ????????????????????
“????????????????? ????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????? ??????????????? ???????? ??????????????? ??????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????” ?? ?????????? ????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????
??????????????? ?????????????? ????????? ????????????????? Andrew Mclay ? ????????? ???????????????????????? ????????? ? ???? ????????????????? ???????????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ??????????? ??????????????????? ????????? ???????????????
?????????????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????? ????? ?????????????? ????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?????????????
???????????? “????????????????? ????????????? ????????????? ??????????? ????? ????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????? ??? ??????????? ????????????? ????????? ?????????? ??????? ??????????????? ???????? ?????????????? ???????? ??????? ???????????????? ???????? ??????? ???????????? ???????” ?? ??????????
????????? Andrew Mclay ? “????? ???????????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????????????? ?????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ???????? ????????????? ??????????? ????????????????????????” ?? ????????
‘???????? ?????????’ ?????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ??????? ???????????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????????
???? ?????? ??????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????? ?????????? ????? ??? ?????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????? ??????? ??????????????????? ????? ????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ??????????????
Burmese Theatre Workshop ??? ???????????? ??????????? ????????? ???????? ????????????? ?????????????????? ??????? ????????? ?????????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????????????? ????? ?????????????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????? ????????? ???????????????
(??????????? ???????????????? ??????????? ????????????)
http://www.mizzimaburmese.com/news/regional/4107-2009-10-29-16-29-35.html
*************************************************************
??????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????????????
http://burmatoday.net/news2005/2009/200910/091029_bty_bur_malaysia.swf
*************************************************************