Race and the US Presidential Race
Oct 16th, 2008
By Sin-ming Shaw
Sin-ming Shaw is a former Visiting Fellow in History at Oxford and Princeton universities.
BUENOS AIRES : Three-quarters of Americans now disapprove of President George W. Bush’s performance. Given this, and the fact that the policies and values of John McCain and his vice-presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, are almost identical to those of Bush, you would expect Obama to be leading in the polls by a wider margin than he is.
The reason that he is not, I suspect, is racism. When polled, most older white voters overwhelming reject Obama, even if many of them are unhappy with Bush. Indeed, one-third of Democrats have at various times told pollsters that they will not vote for a black candidate. And a recent Associated Press/Yahoo News poll suggested that his race is costing Obama six percentage points in the polls.
Most of the time, this racism is covert, only hinted at through code words. The media, particularly the increasingly popular conservative media and talk radio, are particularly important here. Obama is consistently criticized for his “otherness” and his “arrogance,” terms that call to mind the image of the “uppity nigger” from the days of segregation, which are actually not so far in America’s past.
In a recent interview, Bill O’Reilly, the most popular TV talk show host at Fox News, America’s most watched news station, talked down to Obama in so condescending a manner that some viewers were reminded of the image of a slave owner in an old Hollywood movie putting a young black upstart in his place.
Sean Hannity, another star host at the Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News, demanded repeatedly on air from one interviewee, Fareed Zakaria, a well-known columnist at Newsweek with a CNN talk show of his own, whether he thought America to be the greatest nation on earth. The dark-skinned Zakaria, a naturalized American from India with a Ph.D. from Harvard, felt compelled to affirm his loyalty for America twice. It is hard to imagine Hannity demanding such a public affirmation of loyalty from anyone with white skin.
So how much is race costing Obama? The problem is that pollsters cannot effectively measure the problem. They call it the “Bradley effect,” first noted during the 1982 governor’s race in California, when Tom Bradley, the then African-American mayor of Los Angeles, lost the race to his white opponent despite leading in pre-election polls throughout the campaign.
The idea behind the “Bradley effect” is that white voters won’t reveal their prejudices to pollsters. Instead, they lie and say that they will vote for the black candidate when, in fact, they have no intention of doing so.
Of course, many people now say that Obama has proven that the “Bradley effect” is a thing of the past. But his continuing difficulties with white working-class voters, who in the primaries went with Hillary Clinton, suggest that, perhaps, the “Bradley effect” is still alive and well.
Younger Americans accept inter-racial relationships as part of the normal social and sexual landscape. Yet, the very speed with which American society has progressed has threatened half of the country, older and mostly white, unable and unwilling to live in the present.
The moderate Republican Party of Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Rockefellers has been taken over by a radical crowd, with even Eisenhower’s granddaughter now openly backing Obama. So it boggles many non-Americans’ minds that so many in that great nation still do not wake up to the reality that four more years of Republican rule will further degrade and bankrupt the country.
In any civilized society, ignorance is not illegal and being moralistic is anybody’s inherent privilege. But what is alarming is how private religious beliefs and morals have increasingly shaped the secular agenda of America, whose Founding Fathers had specifically designed the Constitution to separate state and church.
Today’s radical Republican Party represents a large segment of the population that believes that abortions and same-sex marriage are immoral, God sent America to Iraq, and that bailing out Wall Street is “socialism.”
At the Republican Convention in August, the ear-splitting chants of “USA! USA!” and “Drill, baby, drill” sounded like cries of desperation, as well as of defiance against an enemy who threatens American’s divine right to remain supreme. Palin has since identified the enemy, proclaiming of Obama: “This is not a man who sees America like you and I see America.” Whether or not her judgment carries a racist undertone, as many observers believe, the polls indicate that many Americans agree.
…………………………….
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2008.
www.project-syndicate.org

October 19th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Mr Shaw should study the essence of US constitution more closely before resorting to racism as an explanation to every unwanted outcome.
Firstly US is the only country admit openly again and again existence of racism and remedy for the past as well as prevention for the future. We have come far and have much further to go. I can not think of any such public admission ever happened in any other country. Has Argentina the country where I am assuming Mr Shaw is presently a resident ever admit to racism. May be there is no such thing as racism in Argentina or anywhere else in the world!
The fact is racism does exist. The only different here in the USA is you can do something about it. It is guaranteed in the constitution.
That being said using racism to characterize voter apathy and archaic example like Tom Bradley effect is proof of your bias perception of our great nation. Evidently the fellowship opportunity at Princeton has not given you to understand what an ordinary American is like. However given Princeton ultra liberal stance on everything you can not be faulted entirely.
Here are the facts:
In USA everybody has a chance. Mr Shaw will not have to try very hard to see enough minority doing great in USA.
Racism exist here but the chance to rectify the wrong is best compared to anywhere else in the world.
I am an Asian American Physician. I have travelled far and wide. I constantly feel discriminatory behavior every where. The worst ones are in Asia. Specifically China. I am 75% chinese and it is unbelievable how derogatorily the chinese characterize me not knowing I speak and understand 6 languages and 14 dialect.
I always tell my children that one must transcend beyond one is perceived as. As such we are very successful and in fact the subjects of reverse discrimination.
Why am I telling you this ? Just to point out the fact that if you can not transcend your perceived character do not blame others for stereotyping you.
If Obama is not elected despite what the polls predict he is to be blamed. There are Asian, African American, Arabic and other ethnic American who are governor, senators, congressperson and in any other imaginable occupation. These people went through exactly the same “racism” that you described and triumph.
Please do not use this “r” word to describe Obama failure. If he fail it is because he is perceived as unsuitable not only because of his race but because he can not transcend his basis character.