Russia-Burma Nuclear Intelligence Report
Jun 26th, 2008
By Roland Watson (Dictator Watch)
June 26, 2008
We have new, disturbing, and detailed intelligence about the assistance Russia is providing Burma’s dictatorship, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), on its nuclear program and more generally its military modernization. This new information both confirms earlier intelligence that we have published, and expands what is known about the overall program.
Nuclear reactor and uranium mining
It has been widely reported that Russia is going to provide Burma a nuclear reactor, for so-called “research” purposes. We have received information that the SPDC has now purchased the 10 MW reactor. It is not new, but is reportedly in good condition. It is being dismantled, transported to Burma, and rebuilt. While we cannot confirm that it has arrived, our sources say that installation is due to be completed by December this year. (We have previously reported that North Korean technicians will assist with the construction.)
The reactor will be built at a site some ten kilometers from Kyauk Pa Toe, in Tha Beik Kyin township, approximately one hundred kilometers north of Mandalay near the Irrawaddy River.
In return for the reactor and other services, a Russian government mining company has received concessions to mine gold, titanium and uranium. There are two gold mining sites: in Kyauk Pa Toe; and in the mountains to the right of the Thazi-Shwe Nyaung railway line from Mandalay Division to Southern Shan State in the Pyin Nyaung area.
Russia is presumably supplying the reactor fuel as well. While Burma has uranium ore, and mills to convert it to yellowcake, this must be enriched to create the fuel, typically using cascades of gas centrifuges. We have received one report that the SPDC has begun a centrifuge program, at the South Nawin Dam, but this is unconfirmed. Barring this operation, the source of the fuel therefore must be Russia.
In addition to Russia, North Korean technicians have been helping Burma with its nuclear ambitions (and other weapons programs), and we have received information that the SPDC has given the North refined uranium in return, which may be destined for the enrichment program.
Precision-guided munitions
Moreover, Burma is researching the production of guided missiles, and with Russian assistance intends to build a rocket factory in Thazi Township. This will mark the latest step in a well-recognized proliferation of Russian precision-guided munitions in the Asia Pacific region. This class of weapons includes surface to air, to attack jets, and surface to surface to attack land-based targets and also ships. Cruise missiles fall within the category. We do not know which specific PGMs the factory intends to produce, only that they will be medium range guided rockets and that production is scheduled to begin within five years.
Military modernization
Coupled with the materiel acquisitions is a major educational program. There are more than 5,000 State Scholars in Russia, all of whom passed their Defense Services Academy class, a nine-month program in the Russian language, and an entrance exam in their specialty. (This is an increase from the 3,000 we previously reported.) They are candidates for either a masters (2 years) or doctorate (4 years – we previously reported 3 years for this degree). They study in Moscow or St. Petersburg, in the former in a suburb at the Moscow Air Institute. There are additional State Scholars from Burma in China, North Korea, Pakistan and India.
One of the more recent groups of scholars, Batch Seven, included 1,100 DSA officers. Their majors are as follows:
250 Nuclear science
100 Tunneling science
200 Rockets
100 Electronics
200 Computer science
100 Aircraft construction
150 Artillery
The students also learn other military subjects, including: tanks; maintenance; anti-aircraft training; ammunition production; fighter pilot training; naval craft construction; naval craft captaincy; and anti-terrorist training.
Read full report on http://www.dictatorwatch.org/articles/russianintel.html
June 26th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
Dear Roland Watson,
We thank you for your research work. This gives us material to work in lobbying the Western governments. At a time when the West is trying to contain Iran, N.Korea, and Pakistan and prevent nuclear proliferation, it would be terrible to have an SPDC-controlled Burma in possession of nuclear weapons, and it is a threat to all of Asia. It is clear from your research that the SA and SS missiles are meant for war with Thailand, the ancient enemy Burmese kings, including “King” Than Shwe. This could set off a nuclear arms race between Burma vs. Thailand, followed by Malaysia vs. Indonesia, and so on. The biggest losers will be the poor people who will only get poorer since more resources will be diverted towards the arms race.
The good things in your article are:
1. Use your facts to lobby the Western nations who are now trying to restrain Iran. Use forcible intervention to prevent SPDC from attaining nuclear status by putting it out of power. This will send a sobering, chilling signal to Iran while liberating the people of Burma.
2. Convince the ASEAN to stop supporting SPDC and start working towards supporting the Opposition with the aim of overthrowing SPDC. A non-nuclear SPDC is already cumbersome. A nuclear SPDC will be impossible to tolerate. The ASEAN nations have the stark options of (a) help overthrow SPDC now, or (b) face the fearful prospect of dealing with a nuclear SPDC which will lead to their own downfall.
3. Try to convince India and China that a nuclear SPDC will no longer be a willing puppet catering to their needs, but a potential enemy, and thus they should stop dealing with SPDC and help the Opposition instead.
In short, I am asking for a three-pronged lobby towards the West, ASEAN, and the India/China pair. Surely one out of three will come to their senses and respond to our lobbying efforts.
Roland Watson,
I’ve always followed your reports; once again I thank you.
Yebaw Day
June 26th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Dear Roland,
Thanks for the latest news.
We need more infos about some countries in ASEAN.We shouldn’t trust to Communist China and some ASEAN countries.
June 28th, 2008 at 4:53 am
Dear Yebaw Day,
Thanks for the compliment. You follow-up analysis is excellent.
Cheers, Roland