<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China reaction on Boycott of this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:12:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tettoe Aung</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5316</link>
		<dc:creator>Tettoe Aung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/#comment-5316</guid>
		<description>Dear Channchann,
Having hatred and resentment against China or the Chinese may not be the right attitude. First of all you must understand that if the military and its leaders in our country are good enough to know that their primary duty is to defend the country and protect the people of their livelihood then China and the Chinese would not dare to exploit us. It&#039;s the opposite now, so whose false is it? The simple example the I would like to give is this;  if a mother who have neither love nor care for her children take another husband (who is not a Burmese but more likely to be a Pauk Phaw) if and when the children are being mistreated and abuse then whose false is it?
Bogyoke Aung San founded the military but that military died with our Bogyoke. The military which Narbu Ne Win and Phyan Aung Gyi inherited and what has become the so-called Tatmadaw of Than Shwe has not only become a tool of China but also an &#039;executioner&#039; for the Chinese.
The people inside the country have been displaced so that Chinese from mainland China or elsewhere and those who left the country for good can come and do their exploitation. It&#039;s like the story of a Chinaman retelling his misfortune that he was robbed of all his belongings but his wife was also raped; but for him the worst thing to bear was not the loss of his property, nor his wife being raped but having witnessed that his wife did enjoyed being treated such.
Most of the Chinese said they had to take over because the locals were not good enough to do commerce. What can you say to that?
They called the Burma Communist Party (BCP or Communist White Flag) sympathiser or proxy of China. To an extent it irrefutable; simply because of the fact that China uses BCP and Wa in the border region  as a political leverage against Ne Win&#039;s regime. The Wa rebel rebel against the BCP and the remnants of them have become &#039;hat in hand&#039; situation at the mercy of China. 
Many lives have been sacrificed to counter China&#039;s scheme of pitching kit against kin,  &#039;painting the cockerels with soot for fighting against each other&#039;. Worst with this military regime is that China does not have to fire a single shot to put the whole country under its thumb. Whose fault is that? China, Chinese or our own military. Your hatred of China and the Chinese may not be justified!
You know Iraq must considered itself lucky. With Ali Barbar and his forty thieves, and then with Sadam Hussein and his fellows thieves there was still more than enough treasures to be looted by the thieves after the fall of Baghdad. With just Ne Win, Aung Gyi, Than Shwe and his military thieves Burma will be lucky if we are left with a grain of sand. Than Shwe&#039;s daughter was adorned with diamond necklace and now with his health deteriorating each day, he will not be able to R.I.P.
(not rest in peace - it&#039;s rise if possible). If he realised what Indonesia&#039;s Suharto&#039;s family have to go through after his death, he should rest assured that his daughter&#039;s diamond necklace will become an &#039;albatross&#039; for her.
Channchann, if you are a Buddhist there is such a thing called &#039;eikthar&#039; and &#039;abeikzar&#039;. The former is a mindset one kept over someone else&#039;s fortunate by one gains nothing out of that mental state. The latter is more serious. In that kind of mental state one actively seeks to destroy the other because one cannot stand his or her fortune. Both aren&#039;t good at all but after all aren&#039;t we all human?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Channchann,<br />
Having hatred and resentment against China or the Chinese may not be the right attitude. First of all you must understand that if the military and its leaders in our country are good enough to know that their primary duty is to defend the country and protect the people of their livelihood then China and the Chinese would not dare to exploit us. It&#8217;s the opposite now, so whose false is it? The simple example the I would like to give is this;  if a mother who have neither love nor care for her children take another husband (who is not a Burmese but more likely to be a Pauk Phaw) if and when the children are being mistreated and abuse then whose false is it?<br />
Bogyoke Aung San founded the military but that military died with our Bogyoke. The military which Narbu Ne Win and Phyan Aung Gyi inherited and what has become the so-called Tatmadaw of Than Shwe has not only become a tool of China but also an &#8216;executioner&#8217; for the Chinese.<br />
The people inside the country have been displaced so that Chinese from mainland China or elsewhere and those who left the country for good can come and do their exploitation. It&#8217;s like the story of a Chinaman retelling his misfortune that he was robbed of all his belongings but his wife was also raped; but for him the worst thing to bear was not the loss of his property, nor his wife being raped but having witnessed that his wife did enjoyed being treated such.<br />
Most of the Chinese said they had to take over because the locals were not good enough to do commerce. What can you say to that?<br />
They called the Burma Communist Party (BCP or Communist White Flag) sympathiser or proxy of China. To an extent it irrefutable; simply because of the fact that China uses BCP and Wa in the border region  as a political leverage against Ne Win&#8217;s regime. The Wa rebel rebel against the BCP and the remnants of them have become &#8216;hat in hand&#8217; situation at the mercy of China.<br />
Many lives have been sacrificed to counter China&#8217;s scheme of pitching kit against kin,  &#8216;painting the cockerels with soot for fighting against each other&#8217;. Worst with this military regime is that China does not have to fire a single shot to put the whole country under its thumb. Whose fault is that? China, Chinese or our own military. Your hatred of China and the Chinese may not be justified!<br />
You know Iraq must considered itself lucky. With Ali Barbar and his forty thieves, and then with Sadam Hussein and his fellows thieves there was still more than enough treasures to be looted by the thieves after the fall of Baghdad. With just Ne Win, Aung Gyi, Than Shwe and his military thieves Burma will be lucky if we are left with a grain of sand. Than Shwe&#8217;s daughter was adorned with diamond necklace and now with his health deteriorating each day, he will not be able to R.I.P.<br />
(not rest in peace &#8211; it&#8217;s rise if possible). If he realised what Indonesia&#8217;s Suharto&#8217;s family have to go through after his death, he should rest assured that his daughter&#8217;s diamond necklace will become an &#8216;albatross&#8217; for her.<br />
Channchann, if you are a Buddhist there is such a thing called &#8216;eikthar&#8217; and &#8216;abeikzar&#8217;. The former is a mindset one kept over someone else&#8217;s fortunate by one gains nothing out of that mental state. The latter is more serious. In that kind of mental state one actively seeks to destroy the other because one cannot stand his or her fortune. Both aren&#8217;t good at all but after all aren&#8217;t we all human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: channchann</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>channchann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>the blood that circulates me is filled with hatred and resentment against china and chinese infiltrating to Burmma. What should I do to extinguish that burning hatred?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the blood that circulates me is filled with hatred and resentment against china and chinese infiltrating to Burmma. What should I do to extinguish that burning hatred?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tettoe Aung</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5278</link>
		<dc:creator>Tettoe Aung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/#comment-5278</guid>
		<description>Dear Professor Ba Than Win,
You were very modest when you said that China &#039;is partly responsible&#039; for what is happening in Burma. If I were you I would apportion more than partial responsibility on China. Think about it, when in 1988 China was one of the first countries to recognise the military regime. A six-member Chinese delegation arrived in Rangoon in October (merely a month after SLORC came into power killing thousands of unarmed protesters and it was after the events of the Tian Anmen massacre) which was shown as an official visit to sell 65 railway carriages to the Burma state-owned railways corporation. 
The military seems to forget that it has lost hundred of thousands of lives fighting against the China backed Communist insurgency led by the Burma Communist Party (BCP). With this military regime the Chinese need not fired a single shot and the whole country has now become a servitude of China. If one were not aware of China&#039;s expansionist ambitions (where maps published in China shows Burma as being part of Chinese territory) it would have been considered as part of &#039;globalisation&#039; where economics dictates politics. 
To me the military in Burma should be renamed as CPLA (Chinese People Liberation Army) since they have no longer adhered to the code on which the military was founded and they have neither protected the country and its people nor defended the country from Chinese invasion.
Boycotting the Olympics must be a distant target while at the same time we should not overlook that, as our founding father of our independence Bogyoke Aung San has reminded us before rising against the occupying Japanese forces, &quot;Our enemies is within our reach.&quot;
Please do not forget that if we allowed China to commemorate the opening of the Olympic Games in August 2008 that will be the day that the China and it&#039;s partners in crime, the generals in Burma - will be celebrating on the blood spilled by our comrades twenty years ago. China hopes to have a disruption free Olympics and it wants most of all &#039;stability&#039; before the Games (stability even in its neighbouring countries). It will have a lot to lose if there is stability in Burma and the fact is without any meaningful national reconciliation the country will burn. All it need is a &#039;spark&#039; and there are ample reasons for the ignition of such a spark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Professor Ba Than Win,<br />
You were very modest when you said that China &#8216;is partly responsible&#8217; for what is happening in Burma. If I were you I would apportion more than partial responsibility on China. Think about it, when in 1988 China was one of the first countries to recognise the military regime. A six-member Chinese delegation arrived in Rangoon in October (merely a month after SLORC came into power killing thousands of unarmed protesters and it was after the events of the Tian Anmen massacre) which was shown as an official visit to sell 65 railway carriages to the Burma state-owned railways corporation.<br />
The military seems to forget that it has lost hundred of thousands of lives fighting against the China backed Communist insurgency led by the Burma Communist Party (BCP). With this military regime the Chinese need not fired a single shot and the whole country has now become a servitude of China. If one were not aware of China&#8217;s expansionist ambitions (where maps published in China shows Burma as being part of Chinese territory) it would have been considered as part of &#8216;globalisation&#8217; where economics dictates politics.<br />
To me the military in Burma should be renamed as CPLA (Chinese People Liberation Army) since they have no longer adhered to the code on which the military was founded and they have neither protected the country and its people nor defended the country from Chinese invasion.<br />
Boycotting the Olympics must be a distant target while at the same time we should not overlook that, as our founding father of our independence Bogyoke Aung San has reminded us before rising against the occupying Japanese forces, &#8220;Our enemies is within our reach.&#8221;<br />
Please do not forget that if we allowed China to commemorate the opening of the Olympic Games in August 2008 that will be the day that the China and it&#8217;s partners in crime, the generals in Burma &#8211; will be celebrating on the blood spilled by our comrades twenty years ago. China hopes to have a disruption free Olympics and it wants most of all &#8217;stability&#8217; before the Games (stability even in its neighbouring countries). It will have a lot to lose if there is stability in Burma and the fact is without any meaningful national reconciliation the country will burn. All it need is a &#8217;spark&#8217; and there are ample reasons for the ignition of such a spark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myo Thu</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/comment-page-1/#comment-5265</link>
		<dc:creator>Myo Thu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/03/01/china-reaction-on-boycott-of-this-year-guest-editorial/#comment-5265</guid>
		<description>China is the most responsible foreign country for junta&#039;s brutality over Burmese people. 
China disturb our efforts to stop junta&#039;s brutality, cruelty. 
China support junta efforts.
Yes, Chinese administration is evil and dangerous.
How can we boycott Beijing Olympics more effectively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is the most responsible foreign country for junta&#8217;s brutality over Burmese people.<br />
China disturb our efforts to stop junta&#8217;s brutality, cruelty.<br />
China support junta efforts.<br />
Yes, Chinese administration is evil and dangerous.<br />
How can we boycott Beijing Olympics more effectively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

