<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burma’s forthcoming referendum and election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burmas-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burmas-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:12:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Than Aung</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burmas-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/comment-page-1/#comment-5253</link>
		<dc:creator>Than Aung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burma%e2%80%99s-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/#comment-5253</guid>
		<description>hi,
I know that everyone entitles to own opinion, but not won facts.
I am not arguing with you about your believe, thoughts, approaches to issues, but the facts you use in your writing are wrorgs, it is not good for you because since it is a good article and seems like you put quite efford in it.
Let me point out some, nothing personal, I just happen to have read the SPDC constitution for at least 5 times so far because I think I should know to be able to agree or disagree upon the real facts.
You said:
1) &quot;President must come from military background&quot; it is wrong.
2) &quot; it allows military to veto any decisions by the parliament&quot; it is wrong also.
3) &quot; it also gives permission to the military to annex power at any time they want&quot; it is half wrong and half right, because it gives permission to the military to annex power, but not any time.

having read your article, I realize that you got alot of good reasoning in it, some of them are very good. I don&#039;t want that these wrong facts make your good article look less.
Please read the SPDC consttution again and find why I said that the  facts mentioned above are wrong.

With respect,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
I know that everyone entitles to own opinion, but not won facts.<br />
I am not arguing with you about your believe, thoughts, approaches to issues, but the facts you use in your writing are wrorgs, it is not good for you because since it is a good article and seems like you put quite efford in it.<br />
Let me point out some, nothing personal, I just happen to have read the SPDC constitution for at least 5 times so far because I think I should know to be able to agree or disagree upon the real facts.<br />
You said:<br />
1) &#8220;President must come from military background&#8221; it is wrong.<br />
2) &#8221; it allows military to veto any decisions by the parliament&#8221; it is wrong also.<br />
3) &#8221; it also gives permission to the military to annex power at any time they want&#8221; it is half wrong and half right, because it gives permission to the military to annex power, but not any time.</p>
<p>having read your article, I realize that you got alot of good reasoning in it, some of them are very good. I don&#8217;t want that these wrong facts make your good article look less.<br />
Please read the SPDC consttution again and find why I said that the  facts mentioned above are wrong.</p>
<p>With respect,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aung-Myint</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burmas-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/comment-page-1/#comment-5249</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aung-Myint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burma%e2%80%99s-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/#comment-5249</guid>
		<description>The people of Burma are a lot smarter that we think. In the end, it is they (the ones inside Burma) who will decide their own future. I wish them well as I believe the true test of their will still lies ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people of Burma are a lot smarter that we think. In the end, it is they (the ones inside Burma) who will decide their own future. I wish them well as I believe the true test of their will still lies ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myo Thu</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burmas-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/comment-page-1/#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator>Myo Thu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burma%e2%80%99s-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/#comment-5214</guid>
		<description>I also agree with the U/Ko Hlaing Than. 
The author also says: [Voting No to the referendum will leave the SPDC still in power holding onto power and with an excuse for extending the road map timetable].

Author wrote:
[3) If pro-democracy parties boycott the 2010 elections, there are two outcomes:
Firstly, the boycott by pro-democracy activists will damage the credibility of elections, and send a clear message to the world that the elections are invalid.]

NO I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WORLD WILL EVER DEFENCE FOR US LONG TIME, after some years, they will recognize Myanmar government. Every country can see only its own country&#039;s benefit.

[And, secondly, it will effectively clear the way for pro-regime parties and military officers to control 100% of seats in the parliament.]
Author already see what disadvantage of boycotting Referendum.

People do not care Kyant Phut. Don&#039;t take account these animals into consideration. for no. 2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with the U/Ko Hlaing Than.<br />
The author also says: [Voting No to the referendum will leave the SPDC still in power holding onto power and with an excuse for extending the road map timetable].</p>
<p>Author wrote:<br />
[3) If pro-democracy parties boycott the 2010 elections, there are two outcomes:<br />
Firstly, the boycott by pro-democracy activists will damage the credibility of elections, and send a clear message to the world that the elections are invalid.]</p>
<p>NO I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WORLD WILL EVER DEFENCE FOR US LONG TIME, after some years, they will recognize Myanmar government. Every country can see only its own country&#8217;s benefit.</p>
<p>[And, secondly, it will effectively clear the way for pro-regime parties and military officers to control 100% of seats in the parliament.]<br />
Author already see what disadvantage of boycotting Referendum.</p>
<p>People do not care Kyant Phut. Don&#8217;t take account these animals into consideration. for no. 2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hlaing Than</title>
		<link>http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burmas-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/comment-page-1/#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>Hlaing Than</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burmadigest.info/2008/02/25/burma%e2%80%99s-forthcoming-referendum-and-election/#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. Yes, this is our opportunity and we should not loose this. What we need now is fair and free process for the referendum and election. We need to put more pressure on the international community to help out and make it happen. If they care about Burmese people this is the time for them to act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. Yes, this is our opportunity and we should not loose this. What we need now is fair and free process for the referendum and election. We need to put more pressure on the international community to help out and make it happen. If they care about Burmese people this is the time for them to act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

